Current medical opinion holds that early screening options for cancer are invariably beneficial. Early detection of cancer consistently yields better treatment plans, outcomes, and overall survival rates. Five-year mortality rates in those diagnosed with non-metastatic cancer, which entails the cancer is still localized, began at 48% higher than those who were diagnosed later. Late-stage cancer is associated with a more distal spread, and is much harder to treat and cure.
Unfortunately, lung cancer has still not received an approved early-screening test. This does not mean that early screening tests are unavailable. However, early detection that is available does not favorably impact the survival rates of lung cancer patients. Early detection tests fail in this regard due to their inability to detect early, localized lung cancer. Continual research into early lung cancer screenings hopes to address these problems and improve mortality rates. Much of the lung cancer that is detected is only done so at later stages. Typical symptoms of late-stage lung cancer include blood in mucus, changes in one’s voice, chronic bronchitis, pneumonia, or continual chest pain. Early-stage lung cancer has few symptoms, if any. Later-stage lung cancer is often well past localized tumors. Lung cancer is notorious for its metastatic properties due to the limited screening methods available. The currently accepted practice for early detection of lung cancer requires an assessment of risk. Those at high risk of developing lung cancer are highly recommended to seek early detection tests. Lung cancer risk increases due to: lung cancer treatment cost in India Advanced age and history of smoking Any previous tumors or lung tumors The diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Some medical professionals believe that early lung cancer screenings are excessive and may do more harm than good. Lung cancer biopsies have the potential to collapse a lung, for instance. Other doctors believe that older patients may not even experience any lung cancer symptoms before succumbing to other diseases. The risk of false positives is also high in current screening techniques. Oncologists recognize that many early detection methods mistake scar tissue and benign growths as malignant tumors. Lung cancer screening methods are currently limited to: Spiral computer tomography scans using low dose radiation Endoscopic examination of bronchial tubes by way of fiber optic camera Review of sputum samples for cancer cell traces X-rays for growths The above screenings each have their faults, whether they be a high incidence of false positives or a low incidence of successful diagnosis. The currently accepted combination-screening method for lung cancer involves spiral computerized tomography combined with a chest X-ray. Get more details : Different Ways to Treat Prostate Cancer
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
Breast Reconstruction: Choosing Implantsdiagnosis of breast cancer and the fight that follows often represent a highly emotional, challenging time for a number of women and their families. In particular, medical procedures such as mastectomy (removal of a breast) can shake a woman's most basic sense of identity and leave equally devastating emotional scars. As part of the rebuilding process, a number of women elect to undergo breast reconstruction surgery. Performed by a plastic surgeon, this procedure returns the breast to a similar shape, size, and look (e.g., the nipple and areola can also be reconstructed). Some women choose to have the surgery immediately after the mastectomy whereas others wait until radiation treatment has been completed. Eventhough there are a number of reasons why women decide to have breast reconstruction, it is important to thoroughly weigh the risks and benefits with your physician-including when to have surgery, what type of procedure to select, and which implant if applicable-as far in advance as possible. |